Critiquing Photography Photographic Approaches This is particularly true when critiquing photos. photo critiques analyze and assess all the elements of a photo with the goal of seeing how well they work together to tell a story. a good critique will take composition, lighting, contrast, shadows, the subject, and so much more into account to see what can be enhanced. Critiquing photographs is a definite skill and there’s a difference between critiquing and criticism that makes one much more valuable than the other. true criticism mainly involves finding fault, with the focus primarily on technical issues rather than emotional reactions. in contrast, critiquing looks to provide feedback, usually (but not.
Critiquing Photography Art180 Photographic Approaches 3.) have a purpose. blanket criticism without justification or suggestions for improvement is extremely off putting (see tip 10). if you truly want to help someone improve, don't just tell them. 1) look. first of all, take a close look at the photograph. let your eyes scan it closely: make sure that you’ve caught every possible detail of the photo. if something jumps out at you as being really good or really bad, note it, but don’t say anything. 2) interpretation. now, talk about the photo for a little bit. Uji kyoto, 2018. generally when i give a constructive critique to a photographer, this is what i do: tell them what you like about the photograph: what you find interesting, or visually appealing. tell them what distracts you in the photograph, or what you don’t like. constructive ideas on how they can improve their photos in the future. The longer lengths appear to push everything in the scene much closer together. have a look at the example below to see what i mean. you’ll notice that portraits tend to be shot at longer lengths because this compressing effect is flattering and isolates the subject from the camera. it makes the shot feel more natural.
Comments are closed.