Difference Between Abstinence And Harm Reduction Youtube Since very few people choose to abstain from sex until they are married, “abstinence only” messages do not help protect people from pregnancy and or stds. thus, free condoms are a form of harm reduction in public health policy. another type of harm reduction is the use of a “designated driver” when a group of people are going out drinking. However, there is another treatment philosophy that has historically been at odds with these abstinence based approaches. enter harm reduction. harm reduction treatments were designed to “meet.
Harm Reduction Vs Abstinence Treatment Florida Behavioral Health Center A psychologist can help talk you through the various treatment options in terms of both abstinence vs. harm reduction but also the level of care (e.g. outpatient, intensive outpatient, residential. We will use studies with multiple arms comparing abstinence vs harm vs a control group or those that make a direct comparison between abstinence‐based approaches and harm reduction approaches to answer our fourth research question, that is, are abstinence‐based interventions more or less effective than harm reduction‐based interventions. In an effort to clarify matters somewhat, let’s look at the basic pros and cons of both abstinence and harm reduction. abstinence. pros: improves overall physical, mental, emotional, behavioral, and cognitive health. decreases mortality. decreases crime, violence, and legal issues. improves relationships. As a result of these concerns, programs that aim to reduce the harm caused by addiction without encouraging abstinence have been developed. harm reduction is a set of practical strategies and ideas aimed at reducing negative consequences associated with drug use and addiction. it incorporates a spectrum of strategies – from safer use, to.
Comments are closed.